
‘Mad Bob’: man or monster?
Securing an interview with Robert Mugabe was almost as demanding
as researching and writing Dinner with Mugabe, her psychological
study of the man, Heidi Holland tells Percy Zvomuya
Just before Robert Mugabe’s momentous escape from Rhodesia to
Mozambique in 1975, he had dinner with journalist Heidi Holland.
Mugabe had not been an expected guest. Rather, he was the unnamed
“someone else” whom constitutional law expert and Zanu-PF sympathiser
Ahrn Palley told Holland he would be bringing along for dinner.
Holland was surprised when she saw a lean, steel-faced, middle-aged
man on her verandah. Here in the flesh was the man whose photograph
she had published on the cover of Illustrated Life Rhodesia --
the magazine she edited against the instructions of her boss and
to the fury of the Rhodesian security police, who banned it. Soon
after that evening, Mugabe left the country and guerrilla warfare
against the Rhodesian state intensified.
Thirty-two years later Holland met Mugabe again in an interview
at his official residence late last year. If the dinner had been
a chance meeting, the interview most certainly was not: Holland
spent five weeks in Harare waiting for a gap to open in Mugabe’s
diary. While the president flew off to Lisbon and attended to national
and regional engagements, Holland waited in her hotel room ...
and waited.
Although Holland says sheer persistence paid off, her struggle
credentials might have been significant. Which her statement --
in which she claims “my own history [with the nationalists] went
back quite far”-- doesn’t quite capture. It was a Catholic contact
who finally smoothed the way: “Father Fidelis Mukonori got me the
interview with Mugabe,” she says with gratitude in her voice.
Holland’s interview with Mugabe is most likely the first given
to a foreign journalist since those he gave to Sky News in 2004
and the SABC in 2006. Holland describes Mugabe’s office as “quite
plain, but elegant”; she was served a bun and a sausage on “very
fragile” English porcelain. “That place is full of contradictions,”
she says.
Mugabe sat in a gold-coloured, swivel high chair behind a dark
wooden desk in an office dominated by a map of the world. “He is
incredibly lonely. I don’t think I have met a person as lonely
as him.”
Holland says one of the difficulties of the interview was that
she didn’t know how much time she had. “I couldn’t dwell on a particular
question. I covered a lot of ground, but not with the kind of depth
I’d have wanted,” she says. Foremost in her mind were land restitution,
the foundation of the Zimbabwe economic crisis and Gukurahundi
-- where up to 20 000 civilians died at the hands of an army unit
that reported directly to the president -- post-independence Zimbabwe’s
most egregious moral stain.
The interview forms the basis of the concluding chapter in her
tantalisingly titled Dinner with Mugabe (Penguin Books South Africa),
an eminently readable psychological biography of the Zimbabwean
president. While that far-off dinner might have been an impetus
for the book, more pressing and contemporary was the reportage
on Zimbabwe in the past eight years, which Holland characterises
as “simplistic” and not “nuanced at all”.
“A lot of reporters didn’t review the history,” says Holland.
In contrast her study features chapter-length, candid interviews
about Mugabe with key actors in the operatic Zimbabwe saga. Among
them are former Zanu-PF chief spin-doctor Jonathan Moyo; the late
premier Ian “I Told You So” Smith; Lord Carrington, a junior minister
in the Winston Churchill government and British foreign secretary
at the time of the Lancaster House agreement in 1979; Zanu-PF founder
member Edgar “Two Boy” Tekere; former agriculture minister Dennis
Norman; and Mugabe’s niece Patricia Bekele.
Realising that Mugabe’s mental and emotional disposition is very
complicated, Holland saw the need to work with psychologists --
three of them. They analysed and interpreted the interviews and
the author added her own cogent, incisive and, at times, damning
perspectives of Mugabe.
Holland acknowledges that even after working with psychologists
she is not quite sure she has unmasked the man who thrives on public
relations stunts.
“He suppresses a lot of things,” she says of Mugabe, whom she
believes “embodies much of the pain and the anger that is felt
in Southern Africa” towards colonialism.
Talking to Holland you get the sense that here is a book that
portrays Mugabe in images other than that of the inexplicable,
mentally unbalanced, “Mad Bob” monster who, in a moment of pique,
ran down a nation that Julius Nyerere described as a jewel. “I
suspected Britain, apartheid South Africa and white Rhodesians
had a case to answer,” says Holland.
She set about finding people with whom Mugabe had interacted,
including childhood mates, influential priests, political friends
and foes and close relatives, and Donato, his younger brother.
“I knew people who said he was a decent man once … and I spoke
to dozens of people.”
As she researched and wrote the book she was acutely aware that
time was rushing past and some of the key protagonists were dying.
Since she began Donato and Smith have died.
Holland regrets not having spoken to James Chikerema, the late
nationalist and Mugabe’s relative, who was bed-ridden at the time
she was doing her interviews. Others, such as Tekere, Emmanuel
Ribeiro, Lady Soames (wife of the governor of Rhodesia at the time
of the transition), Kazito Bute (almost 100) and Catholic priests
who are quite close to Mugabe, are frail and old.
Holland says that the older people she interviewed brought a certain
authenticity, which younger interviewees might not. “I realised
that old people tell the truth. They have no reason to lie,” she
says. Holland points out that when they talked to her it was almost
as if they were setting the record straight for posterity.
Holland insists that her book is not a revisionist take on Zimbabwe’s
recent history. “One doesn’t want to soften the historical record
… as what he [Mugabe] has done is catastrophic.” Her account is
informed by the realisation that the “monster doesn’t tell us about
ourselves, our systems and our history”.
She says she was pleasantly surprised when Donato, who bore a
striking resemblance to Robert, agreed to see her. “One of the
reasons I looked for him was to see if Mugabe looked after his
family.” The picture she gleaned confirms that hunch. “He is not
just this monster. He is a human being -- certainly not this one-dimensional
villain. He is complicated, intense and an interesting person.
People want him to be more evil than he actually is.”
She says there really is a softer side to Mugabe, who dotes on
his teenage kids. (Mugabe’s first son with Sally, his late wife,
died in the 1960s while Mugabe was in prison). Holland says he
describes his daughter as “silent” and the two boys as “naughty”.
When we turn to talk about Michael, Mugabe’s elder brother, who
died of suspected poisoning at 15, Holland says that while interviewing
Mugabe it was as if it “was happening right in front of him again”.
Michael’s death was a crucial and traumatic moment for Mugabe because
he became, in effect, the first-born. Furthermore, he had to assume
the responsibilities that came with being head of the family after
Gabriel, his father, deserted them for Bulawayo, where he had another
family.
I had the opportunity of listening to the audio discs of the interview
with Mugabe. It is polite without being fawning and executed with
canny guardedness by Holland.
It was a mighty surprise to hear the leader I have always thought
a perpetually angry old man laughing and talking animatedly in
a slightly accentuated and gravelly voice as Holland prods his
memory.
In thinking and writing about her interviewees Holland gives us
Robert Mugabe with all his fatal flaws, foibles, vices -- and virtues.
For that reason Dinner with Mugabe is the best picture of the man
that has ever been published. It is as exhaustive as is possible
in the circumstances and tells us much about Zimbabwe’s painful
past, its tolerable present and its citizens’ hidden selves, with
all their triumphs and blunders.
|